雅思听力 Part 3避坑


辛达雅思代报考位提醒:到2021年4月7日官网没有释放考位,在此提醒广大考生抓紧时间报名,如果暂时没有考位的话可以提交给我们代报,广大考生注意考试时间.


雅思听力Part 3总是因为超长的选项、冷门的常识和叽叽呱呱的对话,让考鸭丧魂落魄,号称听力部分榜首杀手(没错,不是Part 4),而不少学生表明,大部分内容听不懂,往往听到什么词就选有它的选项,大大方方地当散财童子,让考试费打水漂。


  稍有经验的考鸭应该听说过,原词往往是搅扰,可现实也不尽其然,就拿比较新的剑15来说,Test 1-Part 3里的两个长单选答案都在选项中呈现原词,而多选题里同义替换的选项却是搅扰,不得不说,为了反映咱们的真实水平,雅思有在尽力推翻“解题技巧”。


  所以,听到原词与否,辛达雅思代报提醒并不适合用来判断答案是否正确。更何况,选项里的原词你也不一定听全了是不是。


  那么怎样才能听出对话里的玄机,怎样才能奇妙避开搅扰又不误伤正确答案,这里敲黑板给咱们稳固一个“小众”却运用广泛的常识点——虚拟语气,它在听力Part 3中一再呈现,绕得不少同学团团转却不自知,是当之无愧的大坑货,而今日的避坑指北主要便是教咱们逃避它。


  首先,在雅思听力Part 3中,最常呈现的虚拟语气长什么样呢?

  来看到下面辛达雅思代报几个从剑雅真题听力Part 3音频中摘取的句子:

  I think we could have done a bit more work at the beginning …


  剑5-Test 3

  They should have focused on people with low literacy levels …


  剑13-Test 4

  We had some terrible arguments and I would have died rather than apologise to him.


  剑15-Test 1

  没错,便是粗体的could/should/would have done(当然还有它们的否定方式),剑桥大学出版社的语法书English Grammar in Use (4th edition) 对could/should/would have done的运用是这么解说的:Something could have happened = it was possible but did not happen (Page 54),也便是运用could have done 表明曩昔原本能却没有产生/做;You should have done something= you didn't do it, but it would have been the right thing to do (Page 66),也便是运用should have done表明曩昔本应该却没有产生/做;We use would have (done) when we imagine situations or actions in the past (=things that didn't happen) (Page 72),也便是运用would have done表明曩昔原本会但没有产生/做;

  综上,这几种表达后边所接受的内容真实性都恰恰相反,而搅扰便是这么来的。


  接下来咱们看到刚刚几个例句别离对应的题目,进一步理解虚拟语气在Part 3中是怎样挖坑的。

  1)剑5-Test 3第25题(填空)

  题干:too much work in          of the course - could be more evenly balanced.

  语义:在课程中的某个阶段堆积了太多课业,应该更合理地组织时刻。

  咱们要听的便是哪个阶段堆积了太多课业。

  音频中运用虚拟语气引导搅扰信息I think we could have done a bit more work at the beginning …(咱们原本可以在一开始多下点功夫 也便是一开始没怎么弄,和题干语义相反),同学们一激动就把the beginning当成了答案,而现实上,正确答案紧跟在这句话后边I thought it was going to be really easy and then all of a sudden in the second half of the course we got a whole load of work.


  2)剑13-Test 4-Section 3(多选)

  题干:Which TWO things are true about the participants in the study on the traffic-light system?

  这个语义好理解,咱们要听的是关于被研究者的正确描绘。

  这道多选题中有原词搅扰选项A:They had low literacy levels. (他们的文化水平低下)

  而原文运用虚拟语气引导原词,挖了个简单明了的坑:They should have focused on people with low literacy levels …(他们本应该着重研究文化水平低下的人 à 也便是没这么做,与题干相反),许多同学直接疏忽should,以为是完成时。


  3)剑15-Test 1-Part 3(多选)

  题干:Which TWO experiences of sibling rivalry do the speakers agree has been valuable for them?

  搅扰项E. learning to say sorry

  对应音频原文:We had some terrible arguments and I would have died rather than apologise to him.

  这道题运用虚拟语气和否定方式rather than引导搅扰项say sorry的同义替换apologise,意思是“我宁可死都不要向他道歉”,与题干语义相反,在这里,能听到虚拟语气或否定方式任意之一均可以判断搅扰。


  含有虚拟语气搅扰信息的题目远不止这些,并且往往搭配转折、否定和条件引导词呈现,在Part 3(甚至Part 4和其他部分)给考鸭挖坑,而虚拟语气的方式也不止上面提到的几种,听力中呈现比较多是曩昔方式的虚拟,但现在和将来方式的虚拟也有涉及,期望咱们可以好好补足这部分常识,完美避坑,收获目标分。