辛达代报考位提醒：到2017年4月10日官网没有释放考位，在此提醒广大考生抓紧时间报名，如果暂时没有考位的话可以提交给我们代报，广大考生注意考试时间。

各位又到了每周的写作有些窍门大放送时间~之前两期咱们一同学习了归纳写作应当怎样去记听力笔记以及怎样根据教授给出的信号短语辨认出哪些信息是咱们需求反映在写作中的。那么详细应当怎样断定每一句话的效果以及抓取关键信息呢，今天即是见证奇观的时间啦~

首要咱们要知道归纳写作中文章的构造是什么姿态滴~

1st paragraph: leading in + main idea

2nd paragraph: supporting idea 1+ details + (summary)

3rd paragraph: supporting idea 2+ details + (summary)

4th paragraphs: supporting idea 3+ details + (summary)

十分明晰的总分大构造以及

2-4段的主体有些的每一段都是——首句提出辩驳分观点以及之后的细节支撑

这一构造特点在阅览和听力文章都是共同的，让咱们通过一套来看一下吧~

阅览文章的构造如下：

榜首段：大布景是大家都在研究叫做Chaco的大房子究竟是干啥用的，有三个理论很有竞争力。

第二段：榜首个分观点是它的呈现朴实为了住人。

第三段：第二个分观点是缔造它是为了储藏日用食品。

第四段：第三个分观点是缔造它为了祭祀。

随后听力文章就各种辩驳它，记得吗？辩驳的切入点即是提供阅览文章中没有的细节。

Unfortunately none of the arguments about what the Chaco great houses were used for is convincing.

First, sure, from the outside, the great houses look like later and Native American apartment but the inside of the great houses casts serious doubt on the idea that many people lived there. I'll explain. If hundreds of people were living in the great houses, then there would have to be many fireplaces, where each family did its daily cooking, but there are very few fireplaces. In one of the largest great houses, there were fireplaces for only around ten families. Yet there were enough rooms in the great house for more than a hundred families, so the primary function of the houses couldn't have been residential.

Second, the idea that the great houses were used to store grain maize; unsupported by evidence. It may sound plausible that large empty rooms were used for storage, but excavations of the great houses have not uncovered many traces of maize or maize containers. If the great houses were used for storage, why isn't there more spilled maize on the floor? Why aren't there more remains of big containers?

Third, the idea that the great houses were ceremonial centers isn't well supported either. You know that mound at Pueblo Alto? It contains lots of other materials besides broken pots, stuff you wouldn't expect from ceremonies. For example, there are large quantities of building materials, sands, stones, even construction tools. This suggests that the mound is just a trash heap of construction material, stuff that was thrown away or not used up when a house was being built. The pots in the pile could be regular trash too, leftover from the meals of the construction workers. So the Pueblo Alto mound is not good evidence that the great houses were used for special ceremonies.

榜首段——相同的大布景，Chaco的用处必定不是好像阅览文章那样的！

第二段——辩驳分观点1：尽管表面看起来如此，可是里边的壁炉通知咱们这个当地没有住过那么多人呢。假设法推翻了阅览的相应理论。

第三段——辩驳分观点2：没有散落的玉米，更没有装玉米的容器，让咱们怎样信任它使用来贮存吃的呢？相同的假设法把阅览分观点推到。

第四段——辩驳分观点3：Chaco当然也不是用来祭祀的当地。用了一个PA的例子来证明阅览分观点是错的。

辛达小编希望上述对你有所启发，也祝愿能顺利通过托福考试！